Capeless, in a statement to WAMC, rejected which claim and cast doubt on Pucci’s credibility.
“Mr. Pucci is a disgruntled lawyer, whom represented someone who regrettably got associated with a drunken event at Williams university, an alumna, ” Capeless told WAMC.
“We investigated it completely combined with the Williamstown Police Department and discovered that there is not a foundation for in the years ahead with any situation, ” Capeless added. “That’s his problem. ”
Pucci’s client, known in this specific article as Jane Doe, states she had been raped on June 10, 2016, at her reunion that is 25th at. Her name has been withheld because of the Glass even though the DA’s workplace revealed it for this reporter, unprompted, in a public record information response.
The documents, connected here, usually do not retain the title for the target or her so-called assailant. They do contain annoying passages explaining the so-called attack.
Doe and her spouse filed a written report with Sgt. Scott McGowan associated with Williamstown Police Department the day that is next presented to McGowan two bits of real evidence: a rape kit administered with an intimate Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) at Mt. Sinai Hospital and Doe’s clothes from the evening for assessment.
Papers obtained by the Greylock Glass suggest that the rape kit had been tested, yet not that DNA from so-called attacker ended up being gathered.
Two months later on, on 30, Assistant District Attorney Gregory Barry from the Berkshire County District Attorney’s office told Pucci that the office had declined to pursue charges after a review of the facts of the incident august. In December 2016, Doe and her spouse had Pucci request from then-First Assistant DA Caccaviello that Caccaviello guarantee the physical evidence from the situation be held for a couple of years while the victims attempted to follow other appropriate choices.